4 Percent Rule · four ideas0 of 4 ideas marked read on this device

Free course · Module 10

The 4 Percent Rule

Understand the retirement withdrawal shortcut, see why early losses matter and estimate the spending gap your savings would need to cover.

Written by the StockEducation Editorial Team · Reviewed by Associate Professor Charles Lo, CPA, PhD · Updated 16 Oct 2026 · How we check lessons

Pick a topic to learn

Read in order, or return to the idea you need.

Idea 1 of 4

Start with 4%, then adjust the dollars.

The classic rule starts with 4% of the portfolio’s initial value. After the first year, adjust that dollar withdrawal for inflation. You do not automatically recalculate 4% of each year’s new balance. Source 1.

With a hypothetical $1,000,000 starting portfolio, year one is $40,000. If inflation is 3% each year, year two is $41,200 and year three is $42,436. The amount withdrawn changes; its percentage of the remaining balance can move with markets.

This is a way to describe a spending policy, not a guaranteed paycheck. The policy and the assumptions behind its historical tests both matter.

Year one$40,000$1,000,000 × 4%
Year two$41,200$40,000 × 1.03
Year three$42,436$41,200 × 1.03
Adjust the previous dollar amount for inflation.

The classic rule follows an inflation-adjusted withdrawal, rather than a fixed percentage of each new balance.

Hypothetical nominal US dollars and constant 3% annual inflation. These are withdrawal amounts, not investment gains or after-tax spending. No portfolio returns, taxes or fees are calculated in this illustration.
Where did the rule come from?

Bengen’s historical test William Bengen’s 1994 research tested US stocks, intermediate-term Treasuries and inflation-adjusted withdrawals. Its illustrative 50/50 portfolio at a 4% start did not exhaust before 33 years in the tested historical cases. That is a dated result, not a future guarantee. Source 2.

The Trinity study Cooley, Hubbard and Walz’s 1998 study compared withdrawal rates, allocations and payout periods using US data from 1926 to 1995. “Success” meant a positive ending balance in a tested period; taxes and transaction costs were excluded. Source 3.

Is taking 4% of the new balance the same strategy?

Classic inflation adjustment A $40,000 first-year withdrawal becomes $41,200 after assumed 3% inflation, regardless of whether the portfolio rose or fell. This can put pressure on a depleted portfolio.

Percentage-of-balance approach Taking 4% of a new $800,000 balance would instead produce $32,000. That is a different spending policy, with a payment that moves with the balance. Compare the rules explicitly.

Remember this

4% sets the first withdrawal. Inflation adjusts later dollar amounts.

Marks Idea 1 read on this device

Idea 2 of 4

The order of returns matters.

Withdrawals make the order of gains and losses important. The two paths below use the same returns, +20% and −20%, in reverse order. Each begins with $100,000 and withdraws $4,000 at the beginning of each year.

With the gain first, $96,000 grows to $115,200; after the next withdrawal, $111,200 falls to $88,960. With the loss first, $96,000 falls to $76,800; after the next withdrawal, $72,800 grows to $87,360.

Without withdrawals, either return order would leave $96,000. The withdrawals change the arithmetic. This two-year illustration isolates sequence risk; it does not estimate a thirty-year success rate.

Gain first
Year 1 +20%Year 2 −20%
$120,000Same vertical scale
$70,000Start → year 1 → year 2

Year-one closing balance $115,200

After two years$88,960
Loss first
Year 1 −20%Year 2 +20%
$120,000Same vertical scale
$70,000Start → year 1 → year 2

Year-one closing balance $76,800

After two years$87,360
Same returns. Different order. Different ending balance.

Both paths withdraw the same $4,000 at the beginning of each year. The loss-first path ends $1,600 lower.

Hypothetical US-dollar, two-year arithmetic. Start $100,000; $4,000 withdrawn before each annual return; zero inflation, taxes and fees. Graphs use identical vertical scales from $70,000 to $120,000 and connect annual observations only. This is not a complete retirement projection or a historical return series.
Why is an average return not enough?

Cash must be taken out The return sequence determines the balance on which the next withdrawal and return act. A steady-return projection removes that variation, even if its assumed average seems reasonable.

Compare the stress cases The Trinity authors explain why year-to-year variation can change outcomes for a withdrawing investor. Keep timing, withdrawals and inflation explicit when comparing scenarios. Source 3.

Is 4% automatically safe for a retirement today?

Check the assumptions The horizon, allocation, future returns and willingness to change spending affect the analysis. A historical success rate is not a personal probability of success. Source 1.

Account for costs A withdrawal amount is not necessarily spendable income after taxes and fees. A longer retirement, different assets or less spending flexibility can change the plan. The original shortcut does not resolve those questions. Source 1.

Remember this

Test a difficult early sequence, not only a smooth average return.

Marks Idea 2 read on this device

Idea 3 of 4

Size the gap your savings must cover.

Apply the shortcut to the amount the portfolio must fund. In a simplified annual budget, subtract other income available in that same period from planned spending. Use a consistent basis for taxes and inflation.

Suppose planned spending is $60,000 and other income is $20,000. The remaining annual portfolio gap is $40,000. Dividing by 0.04 gives $1,000,000; multiplying by 25 gives the same result.

This is a first-pass estimate, not proof that the balance is sufficient. Changes in income timing, taxes, spending, investment returns or retirement length need a fuller plan.

Annual spending$60,000Simplified budget
Other annual income$20,000Available that year
Portfolio gap$40,000$60,000 − $20,000
$40,000 ÷ 0.04 = $1,000,000.

At a 4% starting assumption, dividing by 0.04 is the same as multiplying the annual gap by 25.

Hypothetical annual US-dollar budget on one consistent tax and price basis. Other income is assumed available for that whole year. The $1 million is shortcut arithmetic, not a recommended or guaranteed retirement balance.
Where do Social Security and pensions fit?

Check the timing Use an estimate for your own entitlement and intended claiming date. US Social Security benefits depend on birth year and claiming age; the SSA explains how starting early changes payments. Source 4.

Avoid a timing mismatch Do not subtract income in a year before it starts. Check survivor arrangements, inflation treatment, taxes and whether amounts are stated monthly or annually. Use local official guidance for other countries.

Remember this

Estimate the portfolio’s spending gap, with income and dates aligned.

Marks Idea 3 read on this device

Idea 4 of 4

Test a starting rate, not a promise.

Change the gap or the starting-rate assumption. The exercise divides the annual portfolio gap by the chosen percentage. A lower starting rate produces a larger illustrative balance for the same gap.

The percentages are comparison assumptions. Choosing one does not establish that it is sustainable or appropriate for you. This calculation does not simulate investment returns or calculate a depletion year.

Turn an annual gap into a rough balance

Hypothetical · first-pass math
Annual portfolio gap$40,000
Illustrative starting balance$1,000,000

$40,000 ÷ 0.04 = $1,000,000

Hypothetical US-dollar arithmetic: annual gap ÷ starting rate. Rounded to the nearest dollar. No return path, inflation projection, fees, taxes, income changes, retirement duration or probability of success is calculated. A larger balance or lower rate does not guarantee sustainability.

Try the Investment Withdrawal Calculator

Compare its assumptions Open the Investment Withdrawal Calculator. Use the original practice inputs: $1,000,000, a 4% first withdrawal, 30 years, 5% assumed annual return and 3% inflation. Confirm withdrawal timing and inflation settings before reading the projection.

Write what it leaves out Compare a 3% assumed return, then note that a steady return cannot reproduce the two different sequences above. Write which spending you could adjust after an early loss and which expenses need another funding plan. A calculator output is a scenario, not a promise.

Remember this

Treat the shortcut as a question to test, not a retirement plan by itself.

Marks Idea 4 read on this device

Quick check

Three quick checks. Feedback straight away.

Question 1 of 3

A $1,000,000 portfolio starts with a $40,000 withdrawal. With 3% inflation, what is year two under the classic rule?

You finished the 4 Percent Rule.

You can explain inflation-adjusted withdrawals, recognize sequence risk and calculate a rough portfolio gap. Continue with the Investing Greats Wisdom Quiz.

A free account saves course progress. Sign in with Google or email.

Review your takeaway card and the learning path
  • Start with the initial portfolio. The classic rule then adjusts the dollar withdrawal for inflation.
  • Watch the return sequence. Withdrawals and early losses can interact.
  • Calculate the gap. Align other income, spending, taxes and dates.
  • Test the assumptions. Historical success and shortcut arithmetic are not guarantees.
See the learning path →

Reading markers and these practice checks stay on this device. They do not mark the LMS lesson complete.

Sources and assumptions

  1. Charles Schwab: The 4% Rule. Classic inflation-adjusted-dollar policy and caveats about horizon, allocation, taxes, fees and flexibility. Current numeric withdrawal estimates are not reproduced here.
  2. William Bengen: Determining Withdrawal Rates Using Historical Data (1994; 2004 reprint). Historical US portfolio assumptions and the illustrative 50/50 test. The 33-year result is a finding in that sample, not a forecast.
  3. Cooley, Hubbard and Walz: Retirement Savings (1998). The original Trinity study’s allocations, 1926 to 1995 data, payout periods, success definition and cost exclusions.
  4. Social Security Administration: Retirement Age and Benefit Reduction. Official US information on birth year, claiming age and early-benefit reductions; use your own entitlement estimate and timing.

Sources checked 16 October 2026. All dollar examples are hypothetical nominal US dollars. The first diagram assumes 3% annual inflation; the sequence diagram assumes zero inflation, $4,000 beginning-of-year withdrawals and two specified returns; the budget and interactive exercise are first-pass division only. No illustration supplies personal advice, an after-tax budget, a current recommended withdrawal rate or a guaranteed portfolio life. Check local rules and obtain qualified advice for an individual retirement plan.

StockEducation provides general education, not personal financial, tax or legal advice. Nothing here recommends a specific security. Investing involves risk, including loss of money you invest.

Start hereStart with 4%, then adjust the dollars.
Go ↓

New to Investing? Start With Our Free Guide

The basics, plus how to check every number AI gives you. Free, straight to your inbox.

Free PDF in your inbox. No spam. Unsubscribe any time.

Learning Path IncludedEvery lesson in the right order, freeGet the Free Guide

AI Robot

Ask Our AI Stock
Learning Assistant

Get instant educational answers about
stocks, investing, and StockEducation.com.

Instant Answers Built With Learners

Educational support only. Not personal financial advice. AI responses may contain errors.

Powered by AI ●

The Ultimate Investing Starter Guide

Free Stock Market
Investing Guide

A beginner friendly guide that covers the essential lessons and concepts every new investor should understand.

Beginner Investing Guide Form

Inside You'll Learn

Stocks & How They Work
Valuation Basics
Compound Interest
Index Funds & Diversification
Warren Buffett Principles
AI Stock Research & More
20+ Pages
of Value
Instant
Download
100% Free
No Strings